English's 'no comment' on Comey a lesson for spokespeople

10 May 2017

Anyone who has attended one of my media training workshops will know that I usually recommend that people accept interview requests from journalists. But there are exceptions.

A media interview is usually an opportunity rather than a threat, even if it’s about a negative issue. That’s assuming the interviewee understands the differences between media interviews and other conversations.

How does this relate to Bill English?

Yesterday the Prime Minister was asked what he thought about Donald Trump’s sacking of FBI Director James Comey. The response was, “That’s a matter for President Trump.”

This was clearly one of those situations where he rightly didn’t want to get involved because any answer would have got him into trouble. But notice how he didn’t say the words, “No comment.” That’s what most people say when they don’t want to answer media questions, but research shows that most people think people who say that either have something to hide or are guilty of something.

There are so many ways of refusing to comment without using those dreaded two words. English gave the perfect response. Not only did he make it clear he wouldn’t comment, but he gave the reason why.

This is something lots of people don’t do. They say they won’t comment, but don’t say why. Let’s take a few examples. If something’s before the courts and you can’t comment, don’t say, ‘no comment’, say something like, “I’d be happy to talk but because this is before the courts, I’m unable to.” That’s genuine and both the reporter and his or her audience would be quite satisfied.

Often spokespeople are asked to name people who may have been involved in some event like an accident. When they refuse, they say something like, “I’m not prepared to name anyone.” That can sound dishonest. What they should say is something like, “They’re all going through a tough time at the moment, so out of respect for their privacy, I’d rather not name them.”

That second answer would again satisfy everyone, but the first could irritate the reporter and imply something is being held back for no reason.

As always, it’s best to cooperate as much as possible with media. But when it’s clearly not appropriate and you have a good reason, say why. It’s important for your credibility.

Join my LinkedIn Group, “Media Training Tips for Modern Leaders” for tips articles, discussions on news media issues and the chance to ask me questions. None of these are available outside the group. Join here.

Written by

Pete is a leading New Zealand media trainer and regular blogger for his company, Media Training NZ . He has helped leaders from all sectors of society communicate with the media and other stakeholders. Pete is a former daily newspaper reporter and press secretary in the New Zealand government. From these roles, he understands the media process from both sides of the camera.

Add a comment2 Comments

Reply Chris Christoff | May 13th, 2017 at 2:00am
Pete, I learn so much from your posts. Thank you, again.
Chris Christoff, author, property developer
Reply Pete Burdon (Author) | May 13th, 2017 at 2:17am
Cheers Chris. Always appreciate your comments.

Leave a comment

Fields marked * are required

My Latest Blog Posts

28 April 2022
Luxon's tax question problem and possible answer
3 February 2022
Christopher Luxon on the money with 'caring' comment
16 December 2021
Why Greg Foran is my Media Communicator of the Year

Subscribe to our newsletter and get our FREE ebook '5 Steps to Pain Free Media Interviews'

Get your copy now

Media Training NZ Limited
PO Box 105721
Auckland 1070
PO Box 36-251
Christchurch 8011
Email: Pete Burdon
Tel: 029 200 8555
Website by
Limelight Online